References
Ball, D. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 4048.
Birman, B., et al. (1997). The effectiveness of using technology in K12 education: A preliminary framework and review. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 4162.
Bransford, J. D., Zech, L., Schwartz, D., Barron, B., Vye, N., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Fostering mathematical thinking in middle school students: Lessons from research. In R. J. Sternberg & T. BenZeev (Eds.). The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 203250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, D. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327345.
Cohen, D., & Ball, D. (1990). Policy and Practice: An Overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 347353.
Coley, R., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton, NJ: ETS Policy Information Center.
Cooney, T. (1985). A beginning teacher's view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324336.
DarlingHammond, L. (1995). Practices That Support Teacher Development. Phi Delta Kappan, April, pp. 591596.
Davis, E., & Padilla, M. (1991). Final Report: Developing a Model Teacher Education Program for Middle School Teachers in Mathematics and Science Education. National Science Foundation.
Dossey, J. (1992). The nature of mathematics: Its role and its influence. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3948). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Dreyfus, T. & Eisenberg, T. (1996). On different facets of mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. BenZeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 253284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eisenhower Professional Staff Development (1995). Needs Assessment for the State of Georgia. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
Even, R., & Lappan, G. (1994). Constructing meaningful understanding of mathematics content. In D. Aichele (Ed.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 128143).
Reston, VA: NCTM. GCATT (1997). The status of educational technology in the State of Georgia: A Report submitted to Board of Directors. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Center for Advanced Telecommunications Technology.
Georgia Department of Education. (1997). Quality Core Curriculum. (http://www.doe.k12.ga.us)
Howson, G., Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1981). Curriculum Development in Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515556). New York: Macmillan.
Lampert, M. (1991). Connecting mathematical teaching and learning. In E. Fennema, T. Carpenter, & S. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics, (pp. 121152). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lepper, M. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 289309.
Lepper, M., & Hodell, M. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education, Vol. 3: Goals and Cognitions (pp. 73105). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lieberman A. (1995). Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Educational Reform. Phi Delta Kappan, April, pp. 597604.
Malone, T., & Lepper, M. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. Snow & M. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, Vol. 3: Conative and Affective Process Analyses (pp. 223253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Management, Planning, and Research Associates. (1997). Item and test specifications for the National Voluntary 8th Grade Mathematics Test. The Mathematics Committee Draft Recommendations to the National Test Panel. Washington, DC: Author.
McGrevin C.Z. and Maxey J.H. (April1998). The Changing World of the Novice Principal: The Contextual Influence on What They Need to Know. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology's role in education reform: Findings from a national study of innovating schools. Washington, DC: OERI.
National Academy of Sciences and Engineering (1995). Reinventing Schools: The Technology is Now! (http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/techgap/navigate.cgi)
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1983). The third national mathematics assessment: Results, trends, and issues (Report No. 13MA01). Denver, CO: Educational Commission of the States.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An Agenda for Action: Recommendations for School Mathematics in the 1980s. Reston: VA: Author
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston VA: Author.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (1991). Counting on You: Actions Supporting Mathematics Teaching Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Office of Technology Services (1996). State Educational Technology Plan Blueprint. ATL, GA: Georgia Department of Education.
Parzysz, B. (1988). Knowing vs. seeing. Problems of the plane representation of space geometry figures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 7992.
Presmeg, N. (1993). Uses and values of prototypic visual images in high school mathematics. Selected Readings from the 24th Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association. Pittsburgh, PA September 30  October 4, 1992. ED 363 300
Pea, R. (1996). Learning and teaching with educational technologies. In H. Walberg & G.D. Haertel (Eds.), Educational Psychology: Effective practices and policies. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1982). Some thoughts on problemsolving research and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 2737). Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 83103). ASCD Yearbook.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334370). New York: Macmillan.
Silver, E. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problemsolving instruction. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education: An overview (pp. 3360). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105127.
Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127146). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Westat, SRI International, and the National Center for Improving Science Education (1997December). Best Practice in Action: Final Report of the MultiAgency Study of Teacher Enhancement Programs to the National Science Foundation.
Zimmermann, W., & Cunningham, S. (Eds.) (1991). Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. Washington, D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America.
